A56 - A682
Where is it?
The main dual carriageway route between the M65 (and thus the heavily populated Calder valley) and Greater Manchester. A few miles to the south, the A56 becomes the M66. Here, a dual carriageway spur to Rawtenstall leaves the route.
It was spotted by Bryn Buck.
What's wrong with it?
It is, basically, the wrong way round. With just half a mile's warning, the entire A56 and all its traffic must turn off to the left, while the priority route straight ahead dawdles into Rawtenstall just a couple of miles further along. Coming south, the already busy A56 must give way to the A682. This is no way for a high standard trunk route to behave. Shame on you, A56.
Why is it wrong?
The Edenfield bypass, built in the late 60s, took the A56 onto a new dual carriageway alignment and this new road terminated on the existing A56 in Rawtenstall. The Haslingden bypass came along a bit later, connecting to the A56 at this fork junction, taking the number A682. All was well.
However, when the M65 was built in the 1980s, a new bit of road was built connecting the end of the Haslingden bypass to the motorway, and the A56 was rerouted that way, giving Rawtenstall a very wide berth, and causing it to veer off to the side at this junction. Whoops.
What would be better?
This could actually be a very cheap fix — rebuilding the junction would be costly and difficult given the local geography, but no such drastic solution is needed. For a start better signage would help avoid the frantic last-second lane changes by telling motorists what's about to happen. Then the road could be re-marked to make the left-hand lane dedicated to the A56, and the right hand lane split between A56 and A682. Southbound, the A682 could be dropped to one lane so that only one lane of the incoming A56 needs to merge.
Right to reply
Hate this junction? Or do you think it hasn't had a fair trial? Make yourself heard! Post a comment.
These are the most recent comments on this junction. You can see all comments if you prefer.
Bryn Buck is boiling over:
The 50mph speed limit has been in place for a year now and still hasn't changed anything and if it wasn't for some nice people in Whitehall ruining the lives of speed camera operators everywhere I think we could have seen yellow vultures here next before anyone actually attacked the layout and made it better...
I think it's time the HA remarked the northbound exit so that lane 1 was dedicated off, and lane 2 splits. With the reduced speed limit, reduced standards can be employed.
Fun fact: the "Traffic Island: Stay In Lane" sign on the southbound carriageway was demolished in a collision. Good to see that high friction surfacing worked then.
I'm sorry everyone, I hate this junction so much it brings out my internal Jeremy Clarkson. I want to smash it with a hammer.
Scott Spencer has big ideas:
To be quite honest and simple, the easiest and admittedly not the cheapeast option would be to extend the M66 to meet the M65 but that will never happen... such a shame really!
Kaito wants radical measures:
I travel through here every night returning to the Rossendale Valley. I am continually baulked by drivers trying to cut in to left lane at the last possible second. Although good, legal fun can be had by staying in left lane and continuing to Rawtenstall and trapping a late cutter on the A682, requiring a 6 mile detour!
The option suggested of making the "straight on" A682 a "right turn" is the perfect answer. But making a right turn off a dual carriageway must be too radical a move for the Highways Agency. Similar things work perfectly well in the USA - though I did fall victim to it once!!
David Unwin provides some history:
This is another of those half do the job then change your mind schemes, such as the southern end of the M53 in Cheshire.
The now A682 through Rawtenstall and Burnley was originally the A56 all the way from Bury to Colne and beyond in each direction.
During the 1960s it was intended to replace the entire then A56 between Bury and Brierfield, north of Burnley, by a new dual-carriageway route. The Edenfield by-pass was the first section to be built, which terminated temporary in the large roundabout just west of Rawtenstall town centre. The next stage, Bury to Ramsbottom, evolved into what is now the M66.
From Rawtenstall it was intended to by-pass Crawshaw Booth and then follow a new line to the junction of the Burnley by-pass (A646) and the then A56. A new route from there, passing to the east of Burnley town centre, to rejoin the original A56 south of Brierfield was planned to replace the steep hill down into Burnley from the A646 by-pass.
However, with the coming of the M65 and later the A680 bypass of Accrington, the plans for a replacement A56 north of Rawtenstall were abandonned, a by-pass of Haslingden, from the end of the local spur from the A56 to the start of the Accrington by-pass, filled the gap in the through route. Unfortunately that resulted in the planned through route into Rawtenstall becoming a local spur and a local spur to Haslingden becoming the through route, with their junction being laid out back to front!
Bryn Buck has opened a new crate of sarcasm:
Since my last grumble I can say that during the period of works I had the pleasure of being driven into not once, but twice by traffic ignoring the temporary speed limit and narrow lanes and hitting the back of the queue...
Of course, we can now eliminate this entry from Bad Junctions as the newly installed 50mph speed limit and "queues likely" signs on all approaches has made the capacity and lane cutting problems vanish overnight, especially now there are new shiny streetlights to make it easier to see the queue you've just driven into.
It has become so annoying to use this junction in the AM peak that many drivers are now rat-running through Haslingden on the A680 - the exact reason the bypass was built in the first place.
Sort it out someone.